離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》Candidates swap barbs in TV debate
A man yesterday walks past a police barrier outside the Public Television Service （PTS） building in Taipei’s Neihu District, where a presidential election debate was being held. Photo: CNA
REDEFINING CONSENSUS: The use of the so-called ‘1992 consensus’ must be discussed, Tsai Ing-wen said, but Eric Chu shook his head eight times while she spoke
By Stacy Hsu / Staff reporter
The three presidential candidates yesterday exchanged barbs in their first televised debate, putting the spotlight on cross-strait relations while engaging in finger-pointing over several contentious issues.
The closely watched presidential debate, broadcast by Public Television Service （PTS）, began at 2pm with each candidate delivering an eight-minute opening remark.
That was followed by questions from five media representatives, including Liberty Times （the Taipei Times’ sister paper） deputy editor-in-chief Tzou Jiing-wen （鄒景雯）, Central News Agency vice president and editor-in-chief Sheena Chang （張慧英）, United Daily News editor-in-chief Yu Mei-yueh （游美月）, China Times deputy director-in-chief James Chang （張景為） and Apple Daily Policy and Political Center executive vice president Kuo Shu-min （郭淑敏）.
The candidates posed three questions each to their opponents in the third part of the debate, before making concluding remarks.
During the third part of the debate, People First Party （PFP） candidate James Soong （宋楚瑜） asked Chinese Nationalist Party （KMT） candidate Eric Chu （朱立倫） whether he would be able to keep a leash on senior KMT members who have served as cross-strait compradors to the detriment of small and medium-sized businesses.
“It is my belief that cross-strait ties must be forged based on the principles of openness, transparency and institutionalization,” Chu said. “Throughout my political career, I have never tolerated backroom dealings of any sort, whether in cross-strait relations or other exchanges.”
Chu said he would show respect to senior KMT members and consider other opinions.
Chu asked Democratic Progressive Party （DPP） presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen （蔡英文） whether she accepts the so-called “1992 consensus,” saying her ambiguous stance on the issue has left Taiwanese and the international community bewildered.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party （CCP） that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means. Former KMT lawmaker Su Chi （蘇起） admitted making up the term in 2000 when he was head of the Mainland Affairs Council.
“There is a saying: ‘You cannot wake up someone who is only pretending to be asleep.’ I have clearly explained my stance on the consensus, including during my speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington” in June, Tsai said.
Tsai said her goal would be to develop the cross-strait relationship within the Republic of China’s （ROC） constitutional framework and in accordance with public opinion and the nation’s democratic mechanisms, while building ties on achievements accumulated over the past two decades.
“Have I not explained it clearly enough?” Tsai asked. “I have acknowledged that cross-strait talks were held in 1992 for the purpose of furthering cross-strait ties by forging mutual understanding and seeking common ground, while reserving differences. Have I not been clear?”
“It is just that the term did not exist in 1992 and was only created in 2000. I think we should all sit down to discuss the use and interpretation of the term,” she said.
Chu shook his head eight times during Tsai’s response.
Tsai asked Chu whether he would continue President Ma Ying-jeou’s （馬英九） cross-strait policy, which she said has been dominated by the KMT and the CCP, while being marred by back-room dealings and compradors.
She said that Chu’s description of cross-strait relations during his May visit to China as two sides “belonging to one China” runs counter to mainstream public opinion.
“I have told you not to take things out of context. It is a dangerous thing to do when it comes to cross-strait ties,” Chu replied. “The KMT’s stance is to adhere to the 1992 consensus and the notion of one China, with different interpretations. This is our stance and it has never changed.”
Soong said that as Taiwan cannot afford to directly confront China, it should resort to pragmatic policies and seek broader cross-strait cooperation, mutual understanding and exchanges.
Drawing a parallel between Chu and Ma, Tsai questioned Chu’s ability to lead the nation and gain public trust, citing his promise to serve out his term as New Taipei City mayor and the controversial move in October to force the KMT’s previous presidential candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu （洪秀柱） — who was nominated through the party’s democratic primary mechanism — out of the race.
“What choice did I have when I know for certain that Taiwan will descend into misery should the DPP regain power and that many people could lose their jobs if Chairperson Tsai takes office?” Chu asked.
Chu said his decision to run was backed by an elderly woman he met during a trip to New Taipei City’s Tamsui District （淡水）.
She told Chu “the gods will not forgive you if you do not run. You must do this for Taiwan and not think about yourself,” he said.
“Chairperson Tsai has yet to apologize for the corruption, mistakes and waste of national resources that occurred during the DPP’s eight years in power,” Chu said, adding that the DPP has ostensibly taken delight in criticizing and humiliating public servants.
Tsai said the DPP lacked administrative experience when it took over power from the KMT in 2000, adding that Chu had high disapproval ratings as New Taipei City mayor.
“We have reflected on ourselves ... and DPP members heading the six cities and counties [before last year’s nine-in-one elections] were often polled as the best-performing local leaders,” Tsai said. “On the contrary, Chu has repeatedly been ranked at the bottom.”
Chu asked Tsai how she plans to clamp down on land speculation and uphold housing justice when her family has reaped handsome profits from speculative sales of several plots of land in Taipei.
“I have offered a detailed explanation of the matter. Those [investments] were made by my father, who built his fortune from nothing and like many people of his generation saved up hard-earned money and purchased land as an investment,” Tsai said.
“All of his transactions are open and above board,” Tsai said, urging Chu to stop hiding behind others and publish his campaign expenditures.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
People First Party presidential candidate James Soong, left, Chinese Nationalist Party （KMT） presidential candidate Eric Chu, center, and Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen yesterday hold hands during a debate at the Public Television Service （PTS） in Taipei’s Neihu District. Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
