為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES》 NTU quashes students’ transitional justice proposal

National Taiwan University students and alumni yesterday hold banners outside the venue for the school’s university affairs meeting. 
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times

National Taiwan University students and alumni yesterday hold banners outside the venue for the school’s university affairs meeting. Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times

2020/06/14 03:00

By Lee I-chia / Staff reporter

National Taiwan University (NTU) yesterday rejected a proposal by students to establish a transitional justice task force to deal with authoritarian symbols on campus and review the school’s history.

The NTU Student Association proposed that historical researchers and representatives from the Gallery of NTU History, as well as students and faculty from each college, could be invited to form a campus transitional justice task force.

The main duties of the task force would be to investigate and publish facts about historical events, plan commemorative and educational events, remove authoritarian symbols and preserve historical sites of injustice, the proposal said.

After a university affairs meeting yesterday, NTU Student Association president Tu Chun-ching told reporters that the proposal had been voted on and rejected.

However, discussion in the meeting highlighted that NTU needs the task force, as many university faculty members have insufficient understanding of historical events that had occurred on campus and how to deal with them, Tu said.

“Many people mistakenly believe that the transitional justice task force would lead to political struggle and chaos,” he said. “Much of the long-term confusion and conflict has been caused by the wounds of history, which were never acknowledged and dealt with properly, and the victims’ voices have long been neglected.”

Some faculty viewed the proposal as a means for political struggle, and a lecturer even suggested that the discussion be halted, which was very regrettable, Tu said.

It is not a defeat, as it has attracted attention on the importance of the issue, he added.

NTU vice president Chou Chia-pei (周家蓓) told a news conference that 109 people had voted against the students’ proposal and 24 had voted for it.

The student association president was given sufficient time to explain the proposal, after which faculty expressed their opinions, she said, adding that the student representatives did not raise their hands to speak when they were allowed to.

The seventh faculty member to speak suggested that the discussion be halted, as every participant clearly understood the proposal by then, she said, adding that 109 people voted in favor of halting the discussion and one voted against it.

NTU president Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) said that the faculty member who suggested ending the discussion had said that NTU is not excluded from the nation’s regulations, so it already has laws on promoting transitional justice.

“Exploring historical events and deriving scientific formulas are different,” Kuan said, adding that historical events are more complicated, as the data could be scattered and lost over time, or interpreted from different perspectives.

Although the proposal was rejected, the university encourages academics to put aside prejudice, keep an open mind, and explore the truth through academic research, which could serve as important reference for compiling a history of the university, he said.

The proposal to implement a campus transitional justice task force resulted in a group of NTU alumni launching an online petition on Thursday to preserve NTU landmarks, such as the Fu Bell (傅鐘) and Fu Garden (傅園), as the group believed the task force aimed to remove them.

The student association on Friday clarified that its proposal did not mention removing any particular landmark, and that the group’s petition was misleading.

Several representatives from the group of alumni and the student association yesterday held banners in front of the building where the meeting was being held.

The university separated the groups to prevent possible conflict.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門
看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。