離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 Yunlin approves ban on coal use
Wild At Heart Legal Defense Association founder Robin Winkler, center, holds a sign during a rally in Yunlin County yesterday over laws concerning prohibiting the county’s industries from burning soft coal and petroleum coke. Photo: Chan Shih-hung, Taipei Times
EMPLOYMENT: Mailiao Power Corp workers said that if permits to use the fuels in power plants are not renewed, they might go bankrupt or close down
By Sean Lin and Lauly Li / Staff reporters
The Yunlin County Council yesterday passed local legislation prohibiting the county’s industries from burning soft coal and petroleum coke, but environmental campaigners voiced concern that the central government might reject the regulations, sinking their campaign against air pollution.
Anti-PM2.5 Youth Action Alliance convener Chang Chia-wei （張家偉） said that yesterday marked the first council session to discuss the bylaw, which county councilors put to a vote and passed before noon.
The outcome was “totally unexpected,” Chang said.
He said that the bylaw’s passage could inspire other municipalities in central and southern Taiwan to follow up on banning the fuels, thereby improving air quality.
However, he said that the bylaw, proposed by Yunlin County Commissioner Lee Chin-yung （李進勇） of the Democratic Progressive Party （DPP）, was passed without a plenary of the DPP caucus, which he suspected could be due to conflicting stances on the issue among county councilors and the county government.
Citing a statement by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Chang said that there is a high probability that the bylaw would be rejected by the Executive Yuan, which could reflect badly on the county government, as it would draw on public opinion that Lee was just “putting on a show” about cutting industrial air pollution.
The ministry last month said that if all six central and southern Taiwan municipalities that signed a petition against the use of soft coal and petroleum coke were to ban the fuels from being used at coal-fired power plants, Taiwan would face a nationwide power shortage.
According to Chang, some county councilors who attended the session yesterday said that Lee has the authority to deny power plants permits to burn the fuels and that Lee could be using the county council as a “scapegoat” to circumvent public censure if the bylaw is rejected.
Meanwhile, employees of Mailiao Power Corp, a Formosa Plastics Group （FPG, 台塑集團） subsidiary that manages a naphtha cracker in Yunlin, said the ban would result in many of the workers there losing their jobs.
Corporation union director Wang Chen-wei （王鎮緯） said that the permits for two power plants in the complex to use soft coal and petroleum coke would expire next month and in July respectively, and if Lee does not renew the plants’ permits, they might go bankrupt or close down.
He called on Lee to renew the permits.
Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association founder Robin Winkler called Mailiao Power’s remarks a “classic ploy” of an industry trying to avoid its responsibilities by pitting a labor rights issue against an environmental one.
Winkler questioned the legitimacy of Mailiao Power’s statement, saying that the company is attempting to create a “false issue.”
Meanwhile, the ministry poured cold water on the Yunlin Country Government legislation, saying that it would affect the nation’s power generation and the public’s right to electricity.
Citing Article 6 of the Energy Administration Act （能源管理法） and Article 20 of the Air Pollution Control Act （空氣汙染防制法）, the Bureau of Energy said it is the central government that has the authority to ban the burning of petroleum coke and coal for power generation.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
