為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES》 Foundation urges halt to proposed amendments


Lawmakers participate in a session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei on Friday.
Photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins, Reuters

Lawmakers participate in a session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei on Friday. Photo: Carlos Garcia Rawlins, Reuters

2024/05/26 03:00

By Jake Chung / Staff writer, with CNA

The Judicial Reform Foundation yesterday urged the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to halt the Legislative Yuan proceedings immediately on the grounds that their proposed amendments for legislative reforms could be illegal and unconstitutional.

The legislature had passed the second reading of amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) on Friday last week, Tuesday and Friday.

The foundation said in a statement on Friday night that the drafts submitted by the KMT and the TPP contained multiple points of contention and that the version of the amendments could be unconstitutional.

Legislative conflicts could grow stronger if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) were to file for constitutional interpretation and demand a provisional injunction against the amendments, it said.

The addition of a clause under the Criminal Code to provide a legal basis to administratively fine others for holding the legislature in contempt might exceed the parameters of the Council of Grand Justices Interpretations, it said.

Amendments regarding powers of inquiry were too vague, failing to provide legal bases for procedures summoning individuals to give testimony, it said, adding that the amendments regarding an individual refusing to testify were also vague.

Amendments that said individuals attending a testimony hearing could ask for, per agreement of the Legislative Speaker, legal counsel or professional aid was procedurally flawed and infringed on a person’s right to legal representation, it said.

Overall, the amendments granting the legislature the power of inquiry fail to strengthen the legislature’s self-restraint and would only lead to a vicious cycle of endless bickering, administrative fines and further legal suits to dispute the fines, it said.

On requiring the president to answer questions fielded by legislators, the foundation said that constitutionally the president does not answer to the legislature, adding that if the president were to answer, it would turn into an interpellation.

Having the president interpellated on the floor would cease being a state of the nation report, and would also go against Taiwan’s political system, the foundation said.

The foundation urged rational dialogue and said that it supported legislative reforms, but could not condone the passage of amendments without due deliberation.

On Friday, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) announced the end of the day’s session at 11:28pm, after a long day reviewing bills amid protests from DPP lawmakers, and thousands of demonstrators outside the Legislature Yuan in Taipei.

Both sides held press conferences outside the legislature to explain their respective messages to the public, with TPP lawmakers holding signs with QR codes for people to scan and access a TPP-created Google document which contained files explaining the opposition’s proposed parliamentary reforms.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門
看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。