為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 ‘One country, two systems’ an empty pledge: DPP

2017/03/28 03:00

‘RIDICULOUS’: The unfair election system in Hong Kong should be a reminder to Taiwanese to ensure freedom for future generations, DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui said

By Chen Wei-han / Staff reporter

The election of Beijing’s favored candidate, former Hong Kong chief secretary for administration Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) as the territory’s new chief executive shows that China’s “one country, two systems” framework, which guarantees a high degree of autonomy to the territory, is an empty promise, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus said yesterday.

Despite her low popularity, Lam won Sunday’s election with 67 percent of the votes cast by the Election Committee.

There are 3.7 million registered voters in Hong Kong, but the chief executive is elected by a 1,194-member committee, making the vote a “bird cage” election, whereby Hong Kongers are represented by a small number of individuals, DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said.

The election bankrupted the “one country, two systems” framework and weakened the little confidence Taiwanese had in Beijing, Wu said.

The unfairness of Hong Kong’s electoral system in 2014 led to the Occupy Central movement that sought universal suffrage, and Taiwanese, accustomed to universal suffrage, were sympathetic to the movement, Wu said.

Had the Hong Kong election been a direct one, the result would not have been the same, as Lam had an approval rating of 29 percent ahead of the vote, while her main rival, former Hong Kong financial secretary John Tsang (曾俊華), had 56 percent, Wu said.

“Why was there such a ridiculous election? Because the Chinese Communist Party puts its hands into Hong Kong and deprives Hong Kongers of the opportunity to seek freedom. This serves as a clear reminder for Taiwanese that we must ensure that opportunity for future generations,” Wu said.

Hong Kong used to be a leading society in Asia in terms of democratic development, but its democracy has diminished as Beijing has tightened its grip on the territory, DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said, questioning whether Beijing has failed in its promise to protect the territory’s autonomy for 50 years.

“Without the opportunity to have fair elections or freedom of speech, is the so-called ‘one country, two system’ the way of the future?” Lee asked.

Former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), who had been sympathetic of Hong Kong’s electoral system, said “one country, two systems” was being emptied out, Lee said.

In addition to its inability to reflect public opinion, Hong Kong’s electoral system screens candidates in Beijing’s favor, as a prospective candidate needs to be endorsed by at least 150 members from a nominating committee, which is dominated by pro-Beijing elites, DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-chin (葉宜津) said.

“Do Taiwanese want a system that limits candidacy and only generates undesirable candidates?” Yeh said. “The Hong Kong system shows that what ‘one country, two systems’ stipulates is fake democracy.”

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門
看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。