為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

關閉此視窗 請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

    限制級
    您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
    根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

    《TAIPEI TIMES》Redo on amendments quashed

    
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers hold placards at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday celebrating a vote against reconsidering amendments to the Constitutional Court Act, while two Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers, front, hold placards expressing opposition to the KMT’s stance.
Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times

    Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers hold placards at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday celebrating a vote against reconsidering amendments to the Constitutional Court Act, while two Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers, front, hold placards expressing opposition to the KMT’s stance. Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times

    2025/01/11 03:00

    COURT LEGISLATION: The Executive Yuan said it would consider its next steps to safeguard the constitutional order after its move to have court law changes revisited

    By Hsieh Chun-lin and Jonathan Chin / Staff reporter, with staff writer and CNA

    Opposition lawmakers yesterday voted against the Executive Yuan’s request to reconsider amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法), an expected outcome that thwarted the executive branch’s bid to overturn the bill.

    In a revote yesterday, lawmakers from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who together form a majority in the legislature, again endorsed the new measures they pushed through last month.

    The vote in the 113-seat legislature was 62-51 along partisan lines, with two independents joining the opposition parties.

    The amendments mandate that a minimum of 10 Constitutional Court justices hear and rule on a case, and require that a ruling of unconstitutionality be supported by at least nine justices.

    Currently, the Constitutional Court does not set a quorum for reviewing cases and allows rulings to be made by a simple majority vote.

    Lawmakers yesterday debated the veto without inviting Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) to the proceedings before holding an open ballot to decide if it was to be overridden.

    Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus secretary-general Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) said that Taiwan must have a functioning Constitutional Court to preserve the public’s right to protect themselves through legal remedies.

    The amendments would require the Constitutional Court to have a quorum of 10 judges to hear a case and a supermajority of nine to rule against the constitutionality of a law or measure, Tsai said.

    That would render the court virtually useless and contravene the powers the Constitution invested in the judiciary, he added.

    KMT Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said that the DPP should stop opposing the amendments because a KMT-commissioned poll showed 56.7 percent of respondents were in favor of the changes.

    TPP Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) said that a few Constitutional Court judges should not be allowed to decide the nation’s future and that the legislature was well within its rights to change the quorum.

    In response to the vote outcome, Cabinet spokeswoman Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said later yesterday that the Executive Yuan would consider its next steps toward safeguarding the constitutional order after the legislature completes its vote on overriding the veto.

    DPP caucus chief executive Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) said that her caucus is prepared to fight the amendments by measures up to and including asking the Constitutional Court to rule on their constitutionality.

    Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said that President William Lai (賴清德) respects the decisions of the Executive Yuan and the DPP caucus, and would consider every legal recourse in defense of the nation’s democratic constitutional order.

    The court has only eight justices — all appointed by the DPP — after seven completed their terms in October last year.

    How any legal battle involving the Constitutional Court could proceed remains unclear.

    Under normal procedures, the amendments would have to take effect — which would require them to be signed into law by the president — before the Constitutional Court could rule on their constitutionality.

    However, if they have taken effect, the eight justices would not meet the threshold set and could not rule on the case.

    The government could try again to add justices to the court.

    Lai previously nominated seven candidates to replace the seven members whose terms ended on Oct. 31 last year, but all of them were rejected by the legislature last month.

    Lai has yet to name new nominees.

    Additional reporting by AFP, Chung Li-hua and Su Yung-yao

    新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

    不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

    圖
    焦點今日熱門
    看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

    網友回應

    載入中
    此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。