離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES》 Groups stage sit-in for judicial reform
Taiwan Jury Association founder Jerry Cheng, third left, and others hold signs in support of a jury system at a news conference outside the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday. Photo: CNA
LEAVING THE DARK: Taiwan Jury Association founder Jerry Cheng said that with a jury system, judges could no longer rule on cases based on their biased opinions
By Jason Pan / Staff reporter
Members of the Judicial Reform Foundation and the Taiwan Jury Association yesterday were joined by supporters for a sit-in at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei to demand that legislators include a proposed jury system on the legislative agenda.
Yesterday was the sixth day of the sit-in, and foundation chairman Lin Yung-sung （林永頌） said they were disappointed with the results of cross-caucus negotiations during Friday’s extraordinary legislative session, as a proposal for a jury system, which he said the majority of the public wants, was still not included on the agenda.
Democratic Progressive Party legislators are backing the Judicial Yuan’s proposal for a lay judge system.
“There are lawmakers who said that a jury system does not produce a ruling and therefore defendants cannot launch an appeal. This is a distortion, and it shows that most legislators do not understand how a jury system works,” Lin said.
Appeals would not be a problem, as a presiding judge could review the points of a jury’s ruling, and prosecutors could mount an appeal based on that, he said.
Association founder and attorney Jerry Cheng （鄭文龍） said that a jury system is the best way to deliver justice for the people, it is the most open and democratic way for a judicial system to operate, and it has been in use in many countries for more than a century.
“If Taiwan uses a jury system, judges cannot operate in the dark to decide on cases based on their own free will and their biased personal opinion. It would curtail corruption, which is rampant in Taiwan’s justice system, where judges have been convicted for taking bribes, and it would also evade interference from wealthy individuals and powerful politicians,” Cheng said.
He said that in the US, judges give jurors courtesy and respect, and treat them as equals, as should be expected in a democratic society.
However, in Taiwan, judges act with arrogance and hold elitist views, and usually view common people with contempt, which is why the conservative forces in the judicial system and Judicial Yuan are opposed to a jury system, as they want to preserve their privileges and the power to rule over people’s lives, Cheng said.
At the rally, several people who have been wrongly convicted spoke about their own ordeals with the judicial system and urged for real judicial reform with a jury system.
Presidential Office spokesman Xavier Chang （張惇涵） yesterday said that “the government’s push for a ‘national judge act’ should not have been seen as an issue of contention between supporting a jury system or a lay judge system. It should be focused on letting people participate in the prosecution of criminal trials.”
“In the proposed ‘national judge act,’ the judiciary can provide room for the public to participate in criminal prosecution, while utilizing the professional expertise of judges. This would give more openness and transparency to judicial prosecution, and make case rulings fairer for justice to prevail,” he said, adding that the office looks forward to sensible deliberation by all political parties on the issue.
Additional reporting by Lee Hsin-fang
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
