為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 Human error cited in February crash

TransAsia Airways pilot Liao Chien-tsung’s father, second right, and brother, second left, yesterday in Nantou County react to the results of the Aviation Safety Council’s investigation into the crash of TransAsia Airways Flight GE235.
Photo: Hsieh Chieh-yu, Taipei Times

TransAsia Airways pilot Liao Chien-tsung’s father, second right, and brother, second left, yesterday in Nantou County react to the results of the Aviation Safety Council’s investigation into the crash of TransAsia Airways Flight GE235. Photo: Hsieh Chieh-yu, Taipei Times

2015/07/03 03:00

MISSTEPS: An initial aviation safety report said that the pilot of TransAsia Airways Flight GE235 shut down the wrong engine when one of the engines flamed out

By Shelley Shan / Staff reporter

The pilot of the TransAsia Airways Flight GE235 that crashed into the Keelung River in Taipei on Feb. 4 admitted that he shut down the wrong engine in a conversation recorded by the plane’s cockpit voice recorder, the Aviation Safety Council said yesterday.

Council executive director Thomas Wang (王興中) said that a master warning sounded after the aircraft climbed to 1,200 feet (365.8m). The aircraft’s engine warning display (EWD) then showed a series of steps that the pilot, Liao Chien-tsung (廖建宗), should have taken when the No. 2 engine flamed out after takeoff.

The pilot said that he shut down the No. 1 engine instead.

According to the transcript provided by the council, the pilot said: “Wow, pulled back the wrong side throttle,” about eight seconds before the plane crash.

As to why the pilot turned off the No. 1 engine when the EWD showed that the No. 2 engine was the problem, Wang said that the council would begin an analysis in the next phase of the investigation.

The initial investigation showed that four seconds after the flight began to take off, the copilot, Liu Tse-chung (劉自忠), cried out that the plane’s automatic takeoff power control system (ATPCS) was not armed.

Nevertheless, the pilot answered: “OK continue takeoff.”

At 10:52am, the copilot corrected himself, saying: “Oh, there it is. ATPCS is armed.”

Wang said that the ATPCS is a protection mechanism that increases power to the operating engine and turns off the bleed valve if the system detects that one of the two engines on the aircraft generates torque less than 18.5 percent. The system can also switch the failed engine to autofeather mode and inhibit the operating engine from being feathered, he said.

The feathered failed engine helps reduce drag so that the operating engine can generate sufficient power for the aircraft to continue flying, he added.

Wang said the council had inspected the engines and other devices on the ATR-600 aircraft. While the autofeather unit of the No. 1 engine passed the continuity test, the torque signal transmission of the same unit in the No. 2 engine was unstable during testing.

“The flight data recorder showed that the oil pressure, temperature and fuel flow of the No. 2 engine was normal and the engine was still running. However, the signal was not transmitted to the sensor in a reliable manner and the situation subsequently triggered the sequences of the ATPCS. The system then caused the engine to be feathered, which means that it no longer provided any power to the aircraft,” he said.

Data records also showed that the pilot disengaged the autopilot system at 10:52:41am, when the aircraft was at 1,300 feet.

At 10:52:43am, the pilot said: “I will pull back the throttle of the No. 1 engine,” with the copilot answering: “Wait a second, cross check.”

The copilot answered again at 10:53am, saying: “OK, engine flame out check. Check up-trim, yes. Auto-feather, yes.”

At 10:53:06am, the pilot repeated that he would shut down the No. 1 engine. At the same time, the copilot said that he had confirmed that the No. 2 engine was flamed out.

The condition lever of the No. 1 engine was pushed to the position to shut off the fuel at 10:53:24am, and the engine later went into the feather mode as well, according to the data.

At 10:54:05am, the copilot confirmed that they lost both engines. Though the pilot tried to restart the No. 1 engine, it did not accelerate fast enough to generate sufficient power to keep the plane in the air, the data showed.

The pilot verbally confirmed that he had shut down the wrong engine at 10:54:27am. At 10:54:35am, the aircraft crashed into the Keelung River, killing 43 people onboard.

The facts presented by the council also indicated that the pilot had once failed the simulator test to operate an ATR-600 aircraft. The airman overseeing the test said that the pilot had “insufficient knowledge of the quick reference book,” including knowledge on the engine flame out at takeoff. The pilot passed the test in July last year.

Civil Aeronautics Administration Flight Standard Division Director Clark Lin (林俊良) said that the operation manual of the ATR aircraft had said that the pilot should abort takeoff if the ATPCS is not armed and the operation speed fails to reach 70 knots.

Responding to the report, the brother of the pilot said that the council should not blame what happened on his brother and the copilot.

The copilot’s sister, Liu Chun-hsin (劉春新), said her brother and Liao had minimized casualties by avoiding densely populated zones.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門
看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。