為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

關閉此視窗 請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

    限制級
    您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
    根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

    《TAIPEI TIMES》 MAC rebuffs claims of ‘McCarthyism’ in policy

    Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng speaks during an interview in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: CNA

    Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng speaks during an interview in Taipei yesterday. Photo: CNA

    2024/12/29 03:00

    SOCIAL INFILTRATION: China uses ‘united front’ strategies to influence Taiwanese, but a blanket ban on suspected activities would ‘undermine’ democracy

    / Staff writer, with CNA

    Steps taken by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) to counter Beijing’s “united front” efforts would not evoke the specter of McCarthyism in Taiwan, as they are in the best interests of Taiwan and would not hurt its people, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said.

    Chiu made the remarks in an interview with the Central News Agency as he outlined some of the approaches the MAC has adopted to address the challenges of dealing with Beijing.

    On June 21, around one month after President William Lai (賴清德) took office, Chinese authorities announced a set of legal guidelines targeting advocates of Taiwanese independence, with the most severe punishment being the death penalty.

    The guidelines’ scope was “extremely broad and overly expansive,” Chiu said, adding that, under the provisions, anyone who does not support the Chinese Communist Party’s unification policies “could almost certainly face legal consequences.”

    In response, the MAC raised the travel alert for China, Hong Kong and Macau to the second-highest “orange” level, and lodged a protest with Chinese authorities over the serious personal safety risks the rules posed to Taiwanese in China.

    The protest included rejecting applications from high-ranking officials of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) to visit Taiwan. Those denied entry included Jin Mei (金梅), director of the Shanghai Municipal TAO, earlier this month for the Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum in Taipei.

    The same approach would continue, Chiu said, adding that entry would only be granted if the officials would agree to meet with the MAC in a way where “we could lodge a protest regarding this matter [the issuance of the guidelines].”

    Social infiltration that employs “united front” strategies aimed at dividing and influencing Taiwanese society has been part of Beijing’s actions since May 20 for “a multifaceted form of pressure” on Taiwan, he said.

    While Chiu defined “united front” strategies as efforts to “exploit and create internal conflicts among adversaries,” some have said that Taiwan’s crackdown on such activities fosters an environment that could in time evoke the specter of McCarthyism.

    McCarthyism, named after late US senator Joseph McCarthy, cultivated paranoid fear and suspicion of communist influence in the late 1940s and early 1950s, often leading to unjust accusations, social division and the suppression of differing opinions.

    The term “united front” is often used by the MAC to denounce China’s attempts to influence Taiwan, including when it criticized a small number of Taiwanese entertainers for echoing China’s military threats against Taiwan in October.

    As to whether a phenomenon similar to McCarthyism could occur in Taiwan, Chiu rejected such a possibility. Imposing a direct ban on suspected “united front” efforts would be “the quickest and simplest solution,” he said.

    The MAC was against such a step because “it would undermine the principles of freedom and democracy, and disrupt the normal functioning of a constitutional democracy,” he said.

    The MAC’s approach is to focus on educating the public to identify “united front” strategies and push for legislation, such as the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), to defend democracy, he said

    Among other measures the MAC could resort to in countering Chinese threats is fostering international exchanges, Chiu said.

    To build ties with like-minded democratic nations and help them manage their relations with China, Chiu said the MAC provides Taiwan’s overseas offices with detailed weekly reports on the cross-strait situation, offering in-depth analyses of bilateral relations.

    Those reports are subsequently shared by Taiwan’s diplomatic missions with “local friends,” helping deepen collaboration on navigating relations with China, he said.

    If there was an area in which there was hope for progress, it was tourism, but there was little indication from Chiu that the situation would improve in the near future.

    In 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Chinese visitors accounted for about one-quarter of all foreign visitors to Taiwan, but that source of tourism income has all but dried up, with independent or group travel largely frozen by the Chinese authorities for more than four years.

    “The crux of the issue lies in the unwillingness [of Chinese authorities] to lift the travel ban,” Chiu said.

    While some Chinese officials have expressed a willingness to ease restrictions, they have attached numerous conditions, said Chiu, who described some of the conditions as “involving political manipulation.”

    If China’s lifting of the ban touches on political issues, or if tourism is used as a form of economic leverage against Taiwan, it would raise significant concerns for the MAC, he said.

    新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

    不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

    圖
    焦點今日熱門
    看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

    網友回應

    載入中
    此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。