離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES》Individual doctor ads legal, court says
Constitutional Court Clerk Department Director-General Yang Hao-chin, left, and Judicial Yuan spokeswoman Chen Ting-yu preside over a news conference in Taipei yesterday. Photo: Wu Cheng-feng, Taipei Times
RIGHT TO EXPRESSION: The judgement determined that private individuals were being restricted, but the legal change does not extend to other people and entities
By Wu Cheng-feng and Jonathan Chin / Staff reporter, with staff writer
Individual doctors may now post advertisements for their practices, after the Constitutional Court yesterday partially struck down an article in the Medical Care Act （醫療法） that banned anyone except medical institutions from advertising medical services.
The ban on medical advertisements by individual doctors stipulated in Article 84 of the act was ruled unconstitutional, as it infringes on freedom of speech and occupation, and the right to equal protection, the court said in a news conference marking the decision.
The court’s judgement, which took immediate effect, voided the ban for individual doctors, while keeping in place the ban on medical advertising by all other people and entities, said Yang Hao-chin （楊皓清）, director-general of the court’s clerk department.
Constitutional Judgement No. 17, 2023, was made following a request for an interpretation made by the Taipei Administrative Court in relation to a fine being appealed by a doctor surnamed Huang （黃）, he said.
Huang was ordered to pay NT$50,000 over two Facebook posts promoting a cosmetic injection for wrinkles and hair loss in October 2015, Yang said.
The court consulted the Taiwan Medical Association and Ministry of Health and Welfare in making the decision, Yang said.
The association told the court that it considers the ban a defect in the nation’s medical laws and that credentialed medical doctors should have the right to advertise their practice, he said.
The ministry argued that its ban on individual doctors posting advertisements is proportionate, limited in scope and important to the public interest, but furnished no evidence, Yang said.
The ministry also argued that freedom of speech protections do not apply to medical advertisements, as they are not expressions of belief or conscience, he said.
The court believes that the discrimination against individual doctors does not meet the public interest standard, since the article was written just for administrative ease, he said.
It also found no reason to believe that a meaningful difference exists between medical advertisements posted by individual doctors and hospitals in terms of the public’s right to sound medical information, he said.
Another piece of evidence suggesting the restriction was unnecessary was that the Taiwanese medical field had done without it for 40 years, starting from the promulgation of the original medical care act in 1943 until the ban’s enactment in 1986, Yang said.
Further, banning individual doctors from advertising arguably deprived patients of the information they needed for making fully informed medical decisions, thus harming the public interest, he said.
Huang is the only doctor to receive relief for breaching the law, as he was the sole plaintiff, Yang said.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
