為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES》 US lawmaker urges less ambiguity on Taiwan defense

US Representative Adam Schiff, center, attends a hearing in Washington on Wednesday.
Photo: AP

US Representative Adam Schiff, center, attends a hearing in Washington on Wednesday. Photo: AP

2021/11/05 03:00

/ Reuters, WASHINGTON

The chairman of the influential US House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday urged US President Joe Biden’s administration to be less ambiguous about what he called a US obligation to defend Taiwan from attack by China.

“I think probably less ambiguity is better than more ambiguity,” US Representative Adam Schiff told the Aspen Security Forum, referring to a long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” over US military intervention in the event of an attack.

“We need to be much clearer about our obligation to defend Taiwan,” he said.

Washington needs to work with international partners “to make it abundantly clear to China what a significant cost it would pay were it to use force to try to invade and take over Taiwan,” he said.

Citing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and occupation of Crimea, Schiff said that without stronger international deterrence, “China and Russia will feel that in this century, it is once again permissible to remake the map of the world by dint of military force.”

Schiff said that China needed to understand from the US and its allies that the economic consequences of attacking Taiwan would be too great for it to bear, adding: “That, I think, may be the most effective deterrent.”

While urging greater clarity about the US response, Schiff said there was “a fine line to walk in when we talk about coming to Taiwan’s military aid.”

“We don’t want to make any pronouncement that will accelerate Chinese thinking or timetable in terms of using military force against Taiwan,” he said.

Biden caused a stir last month when he said that the US — which is obliged by the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself — would come to Taiwan’s defense if China attacked.

Those remarks appeared to depart from strategic ambiguity, but the White House quickly said Biden was not signaling a change in policy, and some analysts dismissed his comments as a gaffe.

US Army General Mark Milley told the Aspen forum that China was unlikely to try to seize Taiwan militarily in the next couple of years, even as it develops capabilities that would enable forcibly retaking the nation.

“But anything can happen,” he added.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門

2024巴黎奧運

看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。