離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES》 Vote did not signal end of strike: union
An EVA Airways flight attendant posts a message of support for the ongoing strike in Taoyuan yesterday, after talks to end the strike ended without an agreement the previous day. Photo: CNA
CLARIFICATION: Union members were asked whether they agreed with a proposal made by EVA, including a pledge not to take action against striking flight attendants
By Wei Chin-yun, Yao Chieh-hsiu and William Hetherington / Staff reporters, with staff writer
The Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union yesterday responded to questions about the breakdown of strike negotiations on Saturday, saying that the vote it held with union members never implied that the strike was over.
The vote simply ensured that the company’s proposal was considered by all employees democratically, it said.
Members of the public had been asking if the vote was “just an act,” but this was not the case, the union said.
Union members were asked whether they agreed with a proposal made by EVA Airways management on Friday, and if they disagreed, whether they would continue the strike in accordance with Article 11 of the union’s strike regulations, the union said.
Article 11 requires the union to hold a vote every 10 days, it added.
The terms and conditions proposed by EVA on Friday afternoon during negotiations between the union and the airline included a pledge that the company would not take action against the strikers and would cooperate with the union to end the strike.
The airline also agreed to a bonus of NT$300 per trip for overnight flights and NT$500 for transoceanic flights, and said it would allow attendants to rest overnight on flights BR198 and BR108, which fly to Tokyo from October to March, and on flight BR716, which flies to Beijing from April to August, excluding May.
EVA would also host monthly employer-employee meetings, a quarterly board of directors or general manager’s meeting, and semi-annual reviews of duty rosters and work arrangements on regular, predetermined dates, the proposed agreement says.
A personnel evaluation committee would include five elected instructors, who would take turns, one coevaluator with the right to speak and vote, and one serving flight attendant to accompany the person being evaluated, it says, adding that the union would also appoint 11 people as directors or supervisors on the board.
The union’s board appointees would be entitled to 25 annual paid leave days for participating and would have the company’s cooperation in arranging their schedules, it added.
A majority of the union members voted in favor of the proposed deal after it was submitted to union members for a vote from 10pm on Friday to noon on Saturday.
Union and airline representatives met at the Taoyuan City Government building on Saturday to negotiate final terms before signing an agreement, but the talks broke down after three hours.
Union representative Liao Yi-chin （廖以勤） said the company would not agree to not punish the 18 flight attendants who the airline said went on strike on June 20, before the union officially began its strike action, and would not agree to reinstate the benefits and working conditions that striking employees enjoyed before going on strike.
According to a statement issued by EVA on May 8, if a strike hurt its profitability and caused financial losses, it would consider freezing annual wage increases and suspending year-end bonus payments to employees, and would stop offering discount air fares to employees and their families for three years.
EVA on Saturday said it wished to implement a notification period before the start of strikes, but this was not in the proposal originally sent to the union that members voted on, Liao said.
Unlike China Airlines, EVA is a private company and answerable to stockholders, so it cannot agree to unreasonable demands, the company member said, on condition of anonymity, adding that if the airline gave in to the union, it would not be fair to those who continued working under stressful conditions.
Meanwhile, one senior flight attendant said that the union could not rationally defend the 18 flight attendants who walked off the job from 2:30pm to 2:40pm on the day of the strike, as the union had announced that the strike would begin at 4pm.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
