離開
進入《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 NPP urges blocking of MediaTek deal
New Power Party Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang speaks at a news conference in Taipei yesterday. Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
NATIONAL INTERESTS: The party’s executive chairman said that the semiconductor industry does not lack capital and firms should put Taiwan before short-term profit
By Abraham Gerber / Staff reporter
Chinese investment in MediaTek Inc （聯發科）, a leading handset chipmaker, should be blocked to prevent technology transfer, New Power Party （NPP） legislators, an academic and members of the Economic Democracy Union said yesterday, adding that any exceptions made for the firm would set a dangerous precedent.
“Our semiconductor design industry has a large market in China and it faces a huge amount of pressure to allow direct Chinese investment. Taiwanese government regulations are their strongest defense, because it enables them to tell Chinese firms that no is no and there is nothing they can do,” NPP Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang （黃國昌） said.
While most firms in the industry have not publically expressed opposition to the MediaTek deal to avoid Chinese retaliation, many are opposed, because the precedent would lead to further pressure to allow technology transfers by accepting direct investment, Huang said.
“Opening up to Chinese investment is not motivated by a need for capital — our semiconductor industry does not lack for capital. China’s objective is to use direct investment to secure technology transfers,” he said.
“Semiconductor firms should keep in mind the amount of public resources that were invested into nurturing the industry and put national interests before short-term profit,” Huang added.
MediaTek chairman Tsai Ming-kai （蔡明介） has pushed for a conditional relaxation of the ban on Chinese firms making equity investments in local chip designers as a means to gain greater market share in China and the opportunity to participate in the drafting of 5G wireless regulatory standards.
National Sun Yat-sen University sociology professor Tsai Hung-cheng （蔡宏政） questioned whether Chinese investment would guarantee the firm a role in the drafting of the standards, given China’s lack of proprietary technology.
“The only way the Chinese will make rapid progress in the sector is if they have Taiwanese technology — their primary motivation for investment [in MediaTek] is to make a breakthrough,” he said, adding that any concessions would be met with further Chinese demands for board seats and the establishment of research and development centers in China.
“The government must be proactive and prevent companies from acting purely for their individual interests, because China is willing to give the first firm [that pushes for allowing investment] rich incentives to make the breakthrough possible,” Tsai Hung-cheng said.
Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang （賴中強） rejected assertions that technology transfers could be averted as long as Chinese firms are banned from having board seats in Taiwanese corporations.
“Investing firms would wield significant power as major customers and investors, with the full weight of Chinese government capital to back them up. All they have to do to gain access to technology is demand that Chinese and Taiwanese teams collaborate on product innovations,” he said, adding that there is overly broad executive discretion to approve Chinese investment, given the lack of national regulations.
The Economic Democracy Union is a consortium of nongovernmental organizations that played a central role in organizing initial opposition to the cross-strait service trade agreement.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
