為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 Environmentalists protest Kaohsiung freeway project

Environmentalists protest a proposed Freeway No. 7 project yesterday in front of the Environmental Protection Administration in Taipei.
Photo: Chen Ping-hung, Taipei Times

Environmentalists protest a proposed Freeway No. 7 project yesterday in front of the Environmental Protection Administration in Taipei. Photo: Chen Ping-hung, Taipei Times

2016/01/12 03:00

By Chen Wei-han / Staff reporter

Kaohsiung residents and environmentalists yesterday protested a proposed freeway project ahead of its environmental review, saying the freeway would be situated on an active fault line and demanding that the review be halted until a complete geological survey has been completed.

Protesters gathered in front of the Environmental Protection Administration building in Taipei to oppose the Freeway No. 7 project, a 23km section connecting the city’s Siaogang (小港), Daliao (大寮) and Renwu (仁武) districts, designed to divert rising traffic volume surrounding the Port of Kaohsiung.

They said that although the freeway would be situated in a geologically unstable area, geological surveys have not been undertaken, despite repeated demands, while there have also been procedural flaws in the review process.

Chien Chih-Chiang (簡志強), director of a self-help group, said the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, which is proposing the project, has not completed a geological survey or proposed response measures to soil solidification, but instead has issued a document claiming an assessment would be conducted.

“The Cishan (旗山) fault is an active fault system and the Legislative Yuan has requested that [the authorities] conduct surveys in the area. We demand that the project’s review be halted until the Central Geological Survey completes its research,” Chien said.

The Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) states that practical alternatives to a proposed project should be reviewed by an environmental impact assessment committee to determine whether the proposed project is the optimal choice, but the ministry, in a project plan submitted for yesterday’s review, had rejected two alternatives proposed in earlier reviews, Taiwan Water Resources Protection Union spokesperson Chen Jiau-hua (陳椒華) said.

The two alternatives included construction at Guangming Road (光明路) in Daliao and the other to the west of the Gaoping River (高屏溪), but the ministry said the two alternatives were dramatically different from the freeway project and should be treated as new project proposals, refusing to consider them viable alternatives.

In the project plan, the ministry states that the review committee has already finished discussions concerning the topography, geology and soil structure, but the environmental groups disputed that and asked the administration to release audio recordings of the alleged discussions.

Review committee member Lee Yu-ming (李育明) said the discussions on topography, geology and soil structure are still ongoing.

Environmental groups paralyzed the review process using a series of procedural strategies and the meeting was later suspended with no outcome agreed.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門

2024巴黎奧運

看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。