為達最佳瀏覽效果,建議使用 Chrome、Firefox 或 Microsoft Edge 的瀏覽器。

請至Edge官網下載 請至FireFox官網下載 請至Google官網下載
晴時多雲

限制級
您即將進入之新聞內容 需滿18歲 方可瀏覽。
根據「電腦網路內容分級處理辦法」修正條文第六條第三款規定,已於網站首頁或各該限制級網頁,依台灣網站分級推廣基金會規定作標示。 台灣網站分級推廣基金會(TICRF)網站:http://www.ticrf.org.tw

《TAIPEI TIMES 焦點》 Clara Chou not guilty of defamation

Democratic Progressive Party vice presidential candidate Chen Chien-jen, right, laughs during an interview with radio host Clara Chou on Nov. 24 in Taipei.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times

Democratic Progressive Party vice presidential candidate Chen Chien-jen, right, laughs during an interview with radio host Clara Chou on Nov. 24 in Taipei. Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times

2016/01/01 03:00

TARNISHED? Some pundits hailed the court ruling as a victory for Chou and critics of the Ma administration, and as a major blow to the president and his reputation

By Jason Pan / Staff reporter

Media personality Clara Chou (周玉蔻) was found not guilty of defamation by the Taipei District Court yesterday in a case involving President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and allegations of illicit political donations by Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團).

The court’s decision was based on interpretation of Article 310 of the Criminal Code, in stating that “although the defendant cannot prove if the expressed statements were true, if according to the evidence and materials presented the defendant has reason to believe in their veracity, then the case cannot be prosecuted as defamation and its related punishment.”

Prosecutors filed the case against Chou after she made accusations on talk shows and in statements to media outlets in December last year saying that she had evidence that Ma had received NT$200 million (US$6.05 million at current exchange rates) in an off-the-books political donation from the owners of Ting Hsin.

Chou’s allegations came amid a public furor over a tainted food scandal involving the group after the company was found to have used adulterated ingredients in its oil products and she insinuated that Ma had become a “guardian protector,” shielding the group from prosecution.

Some political pundits and members of the public hailed yesterday’s court ruling as a victory for Chou and critics of the Ma administration, and as a major blow to Ma and his reputation.

In response, Ma expressed his dissatisfaction with the court’s ruling and issued a statement saying that he had requested his lawyers to appeal the ruling.

“President Ma regrets the court ruling. In recent years, a number of pundits and media figures have made groundless accusations, saying they have inside information. They have tarnished reputations and such abhorrent actions have resulted in a more chaotic society. We should condemn these developments and therefore we have requested that the lawyers appeal, to preserve goodwill and kindness in society,” the statement issued by Presidential Office spokesperson Charles Chen (陳以信) said.

Chou also accused former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) of receiving benefits from Ting Hsin and said that Senhwa Biosciences chairman Benny Hu (胡定吾), a friend of Ma’s, had acted as a middleman in the NT$200 million donation.

Hu is also a board member of Taipei Financial Center Corp (台北金融大樓公司), the firm that operates Taipei 101.

Chou also alleged that Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) made a secret donation of NT$300 million to then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) last year.

新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES

不用抽 不用搶 現在用APP看新聞 保證天天中獎  點我下載APP  按我看活動辦法

焦點今日熱門

2024巴黎奧運

看更多!請加入自由時報粉絲團

網友回應

載入中
此網頁已閒置超過5分鐘,請點擊透明黑底或右下角 X 鈕。